« Bush Commutes Libby’s Sentence
Ken Adelman on Iraq — Again »

Matthews Calls Out O’Beirne on Perjury Hypocrisy

Posted by Matt Ortega | July 3, 2007

Chris Matthews reamed Kate O’Beirne for her hypocrisy on the perjury issue from her staunch support of impeach of President Bill Clinton in 1998 and her cries of “injustice” when I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby was found guilty of perjury and obstruction of justice by a jury of his peers.

There is, however, a major difference between the Republican Congress pushing to remove Clinton from the highest office for lying about oral sex — lowering the bar for “high crimes and misdemeanors” — and Libby being found guilty by a jury.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • bodytext
  • del.icio.us
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • TailRank
  • Technorati

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 3, 2007. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. The views expressed are of the author, and the author alone, and do not reflect the views of the Democratic National Committee.

2 Responses to “Matthews Calls Out O’Beirne on Perjury Hypocrisy”

  1. gordo
    July 6, 2007 at 4:07pm

    There’s another hypocrisy here: O’Beirne is lying when she says that Clinton admitted to committing perjury. He admitted to lying under oath, which is not the same thing.

    Perjury is telling a lie in an attempt to change the outcome of a trial or investigation. Prosecutors must prove that the defendant could reasonably believe that his lie would have an impact. Clinton’s lying about consensual sex would obviously have no bearing on a trial that was about sexual harassment.

    Also, what’s with the argument that convicted criminals shouldn’t go to jail unless they confess?

  2. Matt Ortega
    July 6, 2007 at 5:13pm

    So much for the “Party of Law and Order,” ey?

Leave a Reply