
Supreme Court reform
The Supreme Court of the United States is corrupt. The breakdown of the Court into right-wing partisanship began in earnest a quarter-century ago with the Bush v. Gore decision. It was a watershed moment for the Court and the country for which we still have yet to recover. The problem exacerbated with the theft of two Supreme Court seats to entrench a 6-3 conservative majority.
Uncorrupt the court
Several disturbing reports revealed serious corruption. Clarence Thomas, the most notable example, accepted luxury travel and other gifts from a billionaire with business interests before the Court. Neil Gorsuch, days before his confirmation to the Court, managed to offload a property—which he unable to sell for roughly two years—for $1.825 million. The Court instituted a voluntary code of conduct—and it is woefully inadequate.
It is capture of the Court by the wealthy and powerful. It must end.
Modernize the Court
In 1789, the Court was established with six justices and later reduced and expanded between five and ten justices over the next 80 years. It was set at nine justices in 1869. It often shifted to maintain parallel with the number of federal circuits which currently stand at thirteen.
Matt will fight for Supreme Court reform. Public perception of the Court continues to nosedive. It is made worse every time the Court abuses the shadow docket, overrules long-held precedent, and contorts to carry out bidding of this administration. He believes we need to:
- Expand the Court to institute membership rotation for each Court term
- Tie the number of active seats to federal circuits (13)
- Establish an enforceable code of conduct by which justices are required to abide
- Prohibit supplemental income while serving
- Guidelines by which justices are required to recuse
- Acts by the justices in which impeachment must be considered
- Greater transparency within the Court
- Cameras for oral arguments
- Court disclosure of public appearances by justices


